Organized Chaos

I have a new hero, and his name is Ahmed. He is my father’s driver here in Mumbai, and I must thank him for safely driving my father safely every day, and now he’s driving me, too. The traffic here is crazy, to say the least. I spend a lot of time gaping out the window, incredulous that we avoided an accident. As far as vehicles on the road, there are big trucks, SUV’s, regular cars, motorcycles, mopeds/scooters, and auto-rickshaws. And there are a LOT of all of these! There are people walking on the side of the road and down the middle of the road. There are no lines drawn on the road, and my father says when there are lines on the road, they are mostly for appearances’ sake — no one really abides by the lines anyway. The intersections don’t really have traffic lights (I have seen only 1 or 2 intersections with them), and there are no stop signs anywhere. Adding to my own personal confusion is the fact that here in India, they drive on the opposite side of the road. I know that doesn’t faze Ahmed, but it does me! Motorcycles and mopeds will zip between cars and trucks. More than once I was sure someone was going to be smashed between our car and a truck. When Ahmed needs to make a right turn (remember, that’s like our left turn), he will turn from any point in the road. That means there might be 2 or 3 cars are attempting to turn right at the same time. You have to go for it when there is the slightest opening because if you wait for the traffic to clear or for an open enough space to make the turn, you will never make the turn. There is an awful lot of braking and horn honking. Even as I write this (at 12:25 AM), I can hear all the horns from the cars 27 floors below me. Added excitement tonight was the rain. It was a torrential downpour. Streets were flooded. And it was the same exact traffic situation. People were walking in water halfway up their shins. No umbrellas. No rain coats. One man got splashed as a car drove by him through a large puddle. There were people on motorcycles and mopeds in the driving rain and crashing lightning and thunder. At one point, we turned a corner and there was a man lying face down in the middle of the street! he appeared to be trying to get up. We were all like, “What happened? What’s going on?” but Ahmed just told us the man probably had too much to drink and was resting in the road. There were people on the side of the road. Hopefully one of them was able to get this man out of the road because I have no clue how we was NOT going to be run over! Ahmed drives a motorcycle here to the apartment building to pick up my dad and my dad’s car. I was quite concerned about him driving home in the storm on his motorcycle. Dad offered to let him take the car, but Ahmed declined. In his village, there really is no place to park the car. He told my dad he planned to take an auto-rickshaw, which in my opinion is only marginally better. They are covered, but the sides are open, so the passenger is still going to get pretty wet. Plus they are little, and not all of them have lights in the front and/or the back, so they are easy to miss on the crowded, crazy streets. Dad suspected he still may take the motorcycle home.

Sunday, we are going with a tour guide to see more of Mumbai. Brenda keeps chuckling because she says I haven’t seen ANYTHING when it comes to traffic in Mumbai yet. All I know is I am glad my new hero Ahmed will be at the wheel.

20130618-204554.jpg

20130618-204603.jpg

Posted in India 2013 | Leave a comment

First Time First Class

How amazing is it when a flight on an airplane is a trip within itself??? I have certainly done my share of flying, and always in coach. But for my trip to India, I got to experience first/business class. My experience started when I arrived at O’Hare and had my own area to check my bags. I was one of three people in line. Then I went to my own security line. Again, I was one of three people. I managed to get from my house to my gate in an hour.

When I boarded the plane, I was thrilled to find a roomy seat and my own armrests! None of that elbow warring for space! I was barely settled in my seat when a flight attendant asked if I’d like a drink before takeoff. I got some nice white wine. I didn’t even have to use a drink voucher for it! I sipped on that all through take off.

I was recently given a hot towel to cleanse my hands. I love hot towels so much! Then I was offered a lunch — salad or mushroom Brie soup, and chicken or cheeseburger. Since I get to do this all again whenever on the plane to Mumbai,I just ordered the soup. I couldn’t resist! Mushrooms! Brie! Yum! While the food was prepared, I was brought a little cup of mixed nits to snack on. I can take or leave nuts, but I decided to nibble on a cashew (no peanuts in my little dish). I discovered the nuts were warm! I couldn’t help myself. I ate them all!

So now I am sitting in my seat with my feet up, watching the rest of a movie I started watching before take off. If this is how my trip starts, I can’t wait to see how the rest of it goes!

Update: I am now on the flight to Mumbai and I just finished dinner on the plane. Our attendant asked me, “Doesn’t everything just taste better when you’re in the air?” By George, I think he’s right!

The appetizer was jumbo shrimp with cocktail sauce. These were some big shrimp! Not Blues Brothers shrimp, but they were good sized for sure! That was accompanied by an Indian-spiced beet root cake with chat masala sauce. I’m not sure what all that meant, but it was definitely pretty! Very deep red, like red velvet cake. However, it was a unique flavor and an even more unique texture. The texture reminded me of tres leches cake. It wasn’t bad, but it took some getting used to!

There was also a salad. Pretty standard fare, but it had fresh mozzarella in it, which I adore!

I took a leap of faith in my main course and chose the Indian vegetarian selection, and it was an unqualified success! The saffron basmati rice was fine. I’ve had that before. But what I especially loved was the cottage cheese in creamy tomato butter. Goodness, I could eat that every day of my life! The chickpea dal with white pumpkin was good. I also really liked the bell pepper, onion, and coconut masala. The combination of spicy and sweet was superb! I used the tomato-onion yogurt to cut the heat on the cottage cheese and peppers. To say the meal was divine would be correct! If this is the kind of food I have to eat for the next two weeks, I’m going to do just fine!

After dinner, they came around with assorted cheeses and grapes. As much as I love cheese, I turned it down because I was absolutely stuffed from all the food so far! But I wasn’t so strong when it came to the ice am sundae…. Mine was made with hot fudge, caramel, whipped cream, and a cherry. It was the best ice cream sundae I’ve ever had!

So my trip thus far has been on nothing but airplanes and gorging myself on food. I won’t deny that I felt a twinge of guilt knowing I was actually eating fabulous food on an airplane while the people behind me on the plane were eating a boxed dinner. But I’ve been there before, and this is a special trip, so I’m going to forgo the guilt and just enjoy myself!

Now I’m going to watch Beautiful Creatures, Identity Thief, and/or Life of Pi and fall asleep in my fully reclining seat!

Posted in India 2013 | 5 Comments

When Imagination is a Bad Thing

From the time we are little kids, we are encouraged to use our imaginations.  My imagination has always been strong.  It’s how I managed to get all my Barbies to communicate with each other.  It’s how I knew what to do when I got to be the teacher when we played school.  It’s how I created songs to entertain my family.  It’s how I managed to write poetry and short stories.  Imagination in other people will be what solves the problems in this world.  Imagination brings about creative problem solving and innovation. But I have decided that sometimes imagination is a bad thing.

I first started to suspect this last year when two of my daughter’s classmates died within a week of each other.  One student, Mitch, died in a kayaking accident on Lake Michigan.  The other student, Allison, dies of a previously undetected heart defect.  Allison was also a former student of mine.  I had a really, really difficult time dealing with the deaths of these two kids.  One reason it was so difficult was because my imagination kept taking over every time I let my mind think about them.  I kept imagining Mitch out on Lake Michigan.  I kept imagining Allison collapsing.  I kept imagining the phone calls the mothers of these children received.  And all that imagining made me feel absolutely panic-stricken.  I could feel a huge pit in my stomach.  I could feel my heart quicken in fear.  All I could do was imagine these terrible circumstances for these kids and their parents.

Today I think I have confirmed that imagination isn’t always a good thing.  This morning, I learned that a former student who is now a freshman in high school was killed in a car accident last night.  At first, I felt sad about it and I was concerned for the students at my school who might have known her (her name was Liz). Then the imagining started this afternoon.  I keep thinking about Liz in the car and the phone call her mother had to take.  As I was walking out of school today, I paused for a moment because I was imagining her in the halls of the school where she was just a short year ago.

Imagining makes you feel things you don’t ever want to feel.  And I know that those things I feel through imaging are not even remotely close to what it feels like in reality.  I don’t pretend to imagine what the parents of Mitch, Allison, or Liz actually felt or feel.  But I imagine it, and the imagination is torturous.

The imagination that helped me as a child is hurting me now as an adult.  And I don’t know how to stop imagining.

If you want, you can read the obituaries for Mitch and Allison, and you can read an article about Liz.

Posted in Emotional Outlet | Tagged | Leave a comment

Let’s Talk Over the Fence

Lots of talk about gun control in the media lately, which has made me curious about gun control in general.  Personally, I don’t believe for one minute that super strict gun control measures will prevent crime.  Will they lower the crime rate?  I don’t know, but probably not by anything statistically significant.  I can’t say that I don’t believe in stricter gun control measures  but I can’t say that I do, either.

For the most part, I think I understand the thought process behind the actions of those who push for stricter gun control laws — the push for increased background checks, for limits on amount and type of ammunition, for certain types of weaponry to be banned.  The motivation seems to be to restrict to the point of prohibitiveness the possession and use of any weapon that seems to be primarily useful only for the rapid and efficient killing of people.  This would be in hopes of preventing tragedies such as Newtown, Aurora, Colorado, and other mass murders and tragedies.  This is a noble intention.  I doubt there is anyone in this country who would say that it would be okay to have incidents like these continue on in the future.  We all want them to be prevented.  Nobody wants the loss of innocent life at the hands of someone with any kind of gun.  I would bet even the NRA would agree with that statement.

But here is what I don’t totally understand.  Why does the NRA and those who are like minded so vehemently oppose seemingly ANY attempt to control guns?

Here is the text of the Second Amendment: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” (Link to source)  Am I to assume that those who argue against gun control laws interpret the Second Amendment very broadly?  I read this article in which the NRA gives kudos to the GOP on adopting a strong pro-gun stance as part of their platform.  After reading this, I figured that was what the NRA was doing — reading the Second Amendment in a very broad light — all citizens of the United States have the right to keep and bear arms.  This is interpreted to mean that arms includes ANY gun and ANY ammunition a gun needs.  Since this right shall not be infringed, then that means no controls of ANY sort.  Am I understanding this point of view the proper way?  Truly, I want to make sense of this.

If I am understanding this all the way that the gun control opponents are, then I guess I understand why there is also opposition for things like waiting periods and background checks.  Those things would be interpreted as infringements????

But here is a question I have: if the amendment is being interpreted so broadly, then why in the article I referenced above is the term “law abiding citizen” used three times?  In reading the text of the Second Amendment, there is no mention of the need for the citizen to be law abiding.  By denying a citizen who doesn’t follow the law the right to own a gun, isn’t that an infringement?  Does law abiding mean only those who commit felonies or violent crimes, or does it also include people who speed and jaywalk, because people who do those things are not law-abiding citizens.  Where is the line drawn at where a citizen stops being law abiding and starts being a law violator who no longer qualifies for the right to bear arms?

If this is an accepted infringement because of the way the SCOTUS has ruled on cases in the past (like those cases referenced in the GOP platform article), where does one draw the line at acceptable infringements and unacceptable infringements?  Why deny gun ownership to a criminal but not allow for limits on some types of ammunition?  Why are background checks okay in some instances (another infringement, no?) but not others?

I don’t know what the answer is when it comes to gun control laws.  I don’t know if stricter laws will help; I don’t know if more lax laws will hurt.  But what I do want to do is understand this issue, so if you are inclined to help me learn about this, please do so.  However, I am NOT interested in any type of debate, quite honestly, because I am not well versed enough to have a debate that would be intelligent.

Pick your side of the fence and talk to me over it!

Posted in Social Issues | Tagged , | 2 Comments

The Unfairness of it All

I love to write.  That’s why I decided to throw this thing up there on the Internet.  Maybe some people will read what I write.  Maybe nobody will.  Regardless, I will write because it is what I love most of all.  Tied with reading, that is.

I read a number of other blogs.  I will admit — sometimes I am jealous of what other people write.  I would love to have the freedom to write whatever I want, but I can’t.  I am held to a different standard, and I just can’t figure out if it’s fair or not.

I’m a teacher.  That means I have to be careful about what I say and do publicly.  For instance, if I have a rough day at work, I need to not say anything about it in a public forum.  I can’t do anything that might appear to be critical of the students I teach or their parents or my colleagues or my superiors.  Teachers in other parts of the country have been disciplined and even fired for doing just those things.  Mind you, sometimes I’ve read stories where teachers deserved it!  Check this one out: http://digitallife.today.com/_news/2012/07/05/12581309-teacher-compares-student-to-orangutan-on-facebook-could-lose-license?lite  This teacher definitely screwed up!  But I fear that if I have a bad day at work — say I caught some kids cheating on a test — and I write about how disappointed I am in those kids, I could get in trouble for that, even if I don’t mention anything that can identify the students.  It could be said that I am presenting students in my district in a negative light or that I am displaying a poor attitude toward students for expressing disappointment.  Is that fair?  It doesn’t feel fair.  In fact, we were even told that it would look unprofessional to post things online that say things like, “Looking forward to summer vacation!” or, “I don’t feel like going to work.”  The thought was we would look negative about our job and therefore the kids we teach.  I get on Facebook every day and see lots of people post equivalent statements — “I hate Mondays!” or, “Only one more hour then it’s Miller time!” or even, “So tired of my boss getting on my case.”  Why can’t I say those things if I want to?

I do write an education blog (http://renbog.blogspot.com/), and I can assure you that I am sometimes nervous about what I write because yes, some things I say could be construed as negative or complaining about my job.  I hate feeling like I have to act a certain way or avoid saying or doing certain things just because I am a teacher.  Obviously, I know that I need to use common sense — I’m not saying that I need to be naming names in online posts blasting students, parents, or colleagues.  But if I want to write about a frustrating day at work, should I be able to do that without fear of punishment?  I think so.

What do you think?  Should teachers be held to a different standard simply because of what they do for a living?

Posted in Rants | Tagged , | 2 Comments